Poll: Public Support for Affirmative Action at an All-Time Low

Glenn Ricketts

According to this NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, public support for race-based affirmative action stands at 45%, the lowest level ever.

Interpretations of the current statistic vary. One is the “Obama effect” – the fact that an African American has been elected to the White House, which leads to public perceptions that race is no longer an impediment to success as it once was. Another is the view that economic inequality has displaced racial disparities as the pre-eminent societal injustice, since both blacks and whites are affected in substantial measure.

There may be some merit in both of these points, but I think that there is another factor that weighs more significantly than either of them, and it's probably also hard to quantify. That is the bewildered sense of injustice and unfairness found among many poor whites, Asians and others who feel just plain cheated by race-based affirmative action, and very ably chronicled by Russell K. Nieli in his magisterial book, Wounds That Will Not HealSee the recent review by Carl Cohen here. And not only cheated, but insulted by the “diversity” colossus that currently bestrides academic hiring, and continues to deny doing what anyone can plainly see that it is doing. C'mon, fellas!  Why, we're just complying with federal law and bringing the country the benefits of a diverse work force – we’re not depriving anyone of anything. It’s all about “fairness.” 

Yes, it certainly is about fairness. Except that it’s increasingly many peoples' sense of "fairness" that’s so affronted by illegal racial quotas, as Nieli demonstrates. And that, I believe, is a big part of what explains the significant drop in public support for “diversity.” Its continuation requires a level of hypocrisy that they simply are no longer willing to tolerate.

The Supreme Court, of course, should not base its jurisprudence on public opinion surveys. And as it approaches its decision in Fisher v. University of Texas, I fervently hope that the justices simply apply the the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment as it reads. That would mean that race-based preferences have got to go.  

But I also hope that this poll catches their eyes as well. The “wounds” are there and real. They don’t need any additional salt rubbed in.

  • Share

Most Commented

November 20, 2024

1.

NAS Welcomes Administrator McMahon's Nomination to Serve as Education Secretary

With McMahon, the new administration has a chance to drastically slim down and depoliticize the Education Department....

January 8, 2025

2.

NAS Condemns the AHA's “Scholasticide” Resolution

The National Association of Scholars condemns the “Resolution to Oppose Scholasticide in Gaza,” which the members of the American Historical Association passed by 428 t......

January 27, 2025

3.

Exclusive Documents: UC-Boulder Breaks Civil Rights Law to Advance Racial Preferences

New FOIA documents grant a window into how the University of Colorado-Boulder, in the name of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, discriminates on the basis of protected class and upholds a co......

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

January 27, 2025

2.

Exclusive Documents: UC-Boulder Breaks Civil Rights Law to Advance Racial Preferences

New FOIA documents grant a window into how the University of Colorado-Boulder, in the name of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, discriminates on the basis of protected class and upholds a co......

October 12, 2010

3.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...